Sunday, February 17, 2008

It's Hard Work...

Writing from, yes, that's right, Mauritius, Tim Lott, jury president for the Le Prince Maurice Award, a luxury book prize for literary love stories, questions why writers have fallen out of love with love.

And in completely unrelated news, exactly how many times must Richard Yates be rediscovered before it sticks?

Close Your Eyes and Think of England

Robert Olen Butler's newest collection, Intercourse offers a fictional glimpse into the sex lives of famous couples, contemporary and historical: Charles and Diana, Bill and Hilary, Henry VIII and Anne Boleyn, even George and Laura Bush (shudder).

Conspicuous by their absence are Butler's ex-wife, Elizabeth Dewberry and Ted Turner.

Sunday, February 10, 2008

Viva Latin America!

In this weekend's Observer interview, Junot Diaz had this to say about his North American writer friends:

"I was kind of bad luck. Most of them paid lip service to the idea that a work of art could take a long time, but a lot of them assumed I was doomed. For them, if they went two years without writing a book, they'd kill themselves. In Latin America, of course, no one would have cared."

They have siesta, we have kvetching.

Here's some new kvetching by Zadie Smith.

Wednesday, February 06, 2008

We Interrupt This Program

During my blog hiatus, I did manage to attend the swankiest book launch ever. A belated congratulations to fellow Bastards Denise Ryan and Carol Shaben, who both have kick-ass essays in the motherhood anthology, Between Interruptions.

Carol sent around this hilarious and painfully accurate portrayal of the writer/editor relationship. Thanks, Carol!

Monday, February 04, 2008

Bitch-Slappingly Good

Nathan Whitlock's first book, A Week of This will be published in April. It's going to be good. I haven't read it yet, but if it's anything like the scathing reviews he's famous for, expect some lacerating prose.

For a time, Whitlock worked at my agent's office and through our frequent exchanges, we became friends. We emailed, chatted on the phone, had drinks whenever I visited Toronto. I wrote him a gushing reference letter to help him secure a writing grant. Whitlock was already building quite a reputation as a literary critic. And though I admired and respected his eloquence and intellectual rigor, I had serious doubts about the value of public criticism, and couldn't help but sympathize with his, er, victims.

You see, in the year before Whitlock and I became friends, I had received a particularly unkind review. Granted, it was only one line (the review was of an anthology in which a story of mine appeared) but it affected me enough that I sat on the bookstore floor and scribbled the heinous accusation (I believe it referred to my use of the second person POV as "fey") onto a scrap of paper, along with name of the wretched reviewer, a name I swore I'd carry in my vengeful heart until the day I died -- right after I scurried out to my car and cried into my purse. The damage was deep and sharp, and it seemed that I might never recover. But eventually, the scrap of paper slipped in with the slurry of papers on my desk, and reviewer's name gave way to larger, more urgent anxieties. Time, apparently, does heal most wounds, at least those inflicted by critics.

Not long after my first book was published, Nathan left my agent's office to focus on his own writing. I was thrilled for him, and we stayed in contact, though more sporadically. It was while I was avoiding work on my second book that I decided to reorganize my rejection file, and discovered, to my amazement, that long forgotten scrap of paper. Though years had passed, the pithy line that had sent me into months of anguish and self-doubt still stung as I read it. And then I burst out laughing. Recorded there in my cramped, wounded scrawl, the agent of my humiliation, the reviewer I had sworn to hate forever: Nathan Whitlock.